Mark Minasi's Reader Forum
Mark Minasi's Reader Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Search | FAQ | Minasi Forum RSS Feed
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 General Forum
 Miscellany (Technical)
 Is this correct ?Windows crashes after 49.7 days
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

dkumar
Seasoned But Casual Onlooker

82 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 07/23/2010 :  08:19:17 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Windows crashes after 49.7 days

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Windows crashes automatically if you don't switch off the machine for 49.7 days.This is accepted by Microsoft.

Do you know why?

In windows the Virtual Machine Manager(VMM) is responsible for creation, execution, monitoring and termination of virtual machines. This VMM is a 32 bit protected mode operating system, provides a number of system service at chip level of programming.

One of these services is "Get_System_Time". This particular service loads the EAX register with the time in milliseconds since Windows started.This service is accurate to 1ms.

EAX is a 32 bit register. So the maximum number of milliseconds it can hold is:

(2^32) - 1 = 4294967295 milliseconds
= 4294967.295 seconds
= 71582.79 minutes
= 1193 hours
= 49.7 days

So after 49.7 days the EAX resets to zero.Most of the Drivers use this Time Service to keep track of the time out of various services they provide. So after 49.7 days the drives cannot use the Get_System_Time funtion of VMM and they crash.

aval
Honorable But Hopeless Addict

USA
2204 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 07/23/2010 :  09:12:07 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Windows crashes after 49.7 days


No it's not correct - certainly not for recent Windows versions (see below).

The fact that Windows servers (mine for example) run for more than 50 days without reboot is proof enough.

Moreover, a bit of research shows that this problem only affected - in some cases - Windows 95 and 98 - obsolete for some time now anyway:

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/216641

http://news.cnet.com/2100-1040-222391.html

Note the date on that last article: 1999
Go to Top of Page

cj_berlin
Honorable But Hopeless Addict

Germany
3173 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 07/23/2010 :  09:13:12 AM  Show Profile  Visit cj_berlin's Homepage  Look at the Skype address for cj_berlin  Reply with Quote
So how come I have servers, virtual and physical alike, that have been running for years?

Evgenij Smirnov
MISSION CRITICAL Business IT Services Ltd.

Revolutionising the PC desktop at a fixed rate (in German only):
PCohnePC.DE
Go to Top of Page

Xenophane
Honorable But Hopeless Addict

Denmark
2790 Posts
Status: online

Posted - 07/23/2010 :  3:04:12 PM  Show Profile  Visit Xenophane's Homepage  Send Xenophane an ICQ Message  Reply with Quote
CJ, you have'nt noticed they stopped working after 49,7 days

SIG> George Bernard Shaw : The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it. </SIG>

You can read my blog at www.xipher.dk
Go to Top of Page

sreeraj
Here To Stay

India
203 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 07/24/2010 :  4:40:29 PM  Show Profile  Visit sreeraj's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Best Joke EVER!!!!

Sreeraj
http://www.sreerajnair.com
Go to Top of Page

Rastor728
Old Timer

USA
361 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 07/26/2010 :  1:03:37 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Xenophane

CJ, you have'nt noticed they stopped working after 49,7 days



Some don't run that long between reboots!

"a fanatic is one who cannot change his mind and will not change the subject." --Sir Winston Churchill
Go to Top of Page

Mark Minasi
Chief cook and bottle washer

USA
9668 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 07/31/2010 :  09:57:20 AM  Show Profile  Visit Mark Minasi's Homepage  Reply with Quote
This is related to a bug in Win 2000 that got fixed immediately if I recall right.

Mark
tweetin' at mminasi
Go to Top of Page

wkasdo
Administrator

Netherlands
6246 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 07/31/2010 :  3:18:23 PM  Show Profile  Click to see wkasdo's MSN Messenger address  Reply with Quote
As I recall it, this was a windows 98 bug that was never fixed.
Go to Top of Page

Mark Minasi
Chief cook and bottle washer

USA
9668 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 08/02/2010 :  4:32:04 PM  Show Profile  Visit Mark Minasi's Homepage  Reply with Quote
The story I heard was that either Win 2000 or NT 4... see how old it is?<g> ... IMMEDIATELY started causing this problem. It turned out that -- duh! -- no one leaves a beta up for several weeks, so no one noticed it. It may have even occasioned the need for a superfast, small service pack. But in any case, it's been fixed for 10 or 14 years, so I don't think there's much to worry about, save for those shops still running NT 4.0 RTM.

Mark
tweetin' at mminasi
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Mark Minasi's Reader Forum © 2002-2009 Mark Minasi Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.12 seconds. Snitz Forums 2000